References
Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). Cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
Khazan, O. (2018, February 18). The More Gender Equality, the Fewer Women in STEM. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/02/the-more-gender-equality-the-fewer-women-in-stem/553592/
Nefzger, M. D., & Drasgow, J. (1957). The needless assumption of normality in Pearson’s r. American Psychologist, 12(10), 623–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048216
Richardson, S. S., Reiches, M. W., Bruch, J., Boulicault, M., Noll, N. E., & Shattuck-Heidorn, H. (2020). Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018). Psychological Science, 31(3), 338–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619872762
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020). The Gender-Equality Paradox Is Part of a Bigger Phenomenon: Reply to Richardson and Colleagues (2020). Psychological Science, 31(3), 342–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904134
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
UIS Education Data Release: September 2019. (2019). UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
West, M., Kraut, R., & Ei Chew, H. (2019). I’d blush if I could: Closing gender divides in digital skills through education.
Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1176–1185.